Nov./Dec. 2006
Strangers
in a Social World — Asperger Syndrome and Bullying
By Jennifer Sisk, MA
Social Work Today
Vol. 6 No. 6 P. 18
Misinterpretation of social interactions
coupled with above-average intelligence make children with Asperger
syndrome perfect targets for bullying.
Lashanda is a 7-year-old diagnosed with
Asperger syndrome (AS). She is usually alone at recess, and
instead of playing with the other students, she spends her
time walking on the border, surrounding the play area. She
thinks about her favorite videogame and replays it over and
over in her mind. Lashanda doesn’t like the noisy playground
and this activity helps her “go away” and relax
enough to tolerate recess. The other kids make fun of Lashanda
behind her back and enjoy taunting her ... they know she hates
to swing and they just enjoy seeing her reaction because Lashanda
says the same thing every time, “Go away, I hate to
swing!” A group of girls ... all go up to her at once
and talk at the same time asking her to swing with them. They
keep following her around saying the same thing over and over,
“Lashanda, come swing with us.” Lashanda starts
yelling at the girls and tries to push them away. One of the
girls trips on a rock and falls down.... She begins to cry,
which brings over the playground supervisor. Lashanda is still
upset and yelling when the teacher arrives. When the teacher
asks what happened, the girls tell on Lashanda for pushing
and yelling at them. The teacher is very upset and concerned
and yells at Lashanda to come with her immediately. Lashanda
is so upset she can’t comply and runs from the teacher
when she grabs for her arm. Other adults come to help, and
Lashanda is carried into the school kicking and screaming.
Lashanda is suspended for three days.
— Excerpt from Perfect Targets:
Asperger Syndrome and Bullying: Practical Solutions
for Surviving the Social World
Every day, children are bullied at school, and
in many cases, they ignore or avoid the bully. Imagine repeatedly
being the target of school bullies, but not understanding that
you are. Or, imagine being manipulated into playing a mean prank
on another student because you believe it means you’ll
become friends, and then not understanding why you are being
punished. For children with AS, every school day is another
occasion to be a target for bullies. And, research has shown
that children with AS are more likely to be bullying targets.
Adroit bullies can easily manipulate children
with AS into behaving inappropriately without understanding
the social ramifications of their behavior. “Because of
their social naivete, children with AS may not even recognize
when they are being bullied and are susceptible to being talked
into doing things that could get them in trouble or will make
them the object of ridicule,” says Rebekah Heinrichs,
MSN, MSEd, an educational consultant specializing in autism
and AS, and the author of the book Perfect Targets:
Asperger Syndrome and Bullying — Practical Solutions for
Surviving the Social World.
In her book, Heinrichs summarizes evidence for
bullying in schools. Studies, surveys, and anecdotal reports
on bullying in United States schools indicate that approximately
20% of middle and high school students are targets of moderate
or frequent bullying, roughly 30% of students in grades 6 to
10 reported being involved in bullying as a target, bully, or
both, and approximately 75% of school-aged students report at
least one incident of bullying during the school year. And,
each day, 160,000 children do not go to school because they
are afraid of being bullied.
Researchers estimate that roughly 10% to 15%
of children who are bullied become targets for frequent and
severe bullying incidents, for various reasons, and approximately
5% to 10% of those targeted for such chronic bullying will require
substantial support as a result. “Children with AS are
overrepresented in this subgroup who are so frequently, chronically,
and too often severely bullied and excluded that if they do
not receive significant support from adults, they will most
likely not be able to progress positively in school and certainly
will not reach their academic potential,” Heinrichs says.
Because children with AS stand out and are alone more often
than their typical peers, they are at greater risk for bullying
and shunning at a time when peer acceptance is most critical
for academic and social development, Heinrichs writes in her
book.
However, there is very little research on bullying
and children with AS, says Heinrichs. One survey of parents
whose children have AS revealed that, compared with the general
student population, children with AS may be four times more
likely to be bullied. “In my own experiences with facilitating
parent support groups and working with children of all ages
with AS, I believe the incidence of bullying may be closer to
100% in this population,” Heinrichs says.
Why are children with AS so much more likely
to be targets of bullying? According to Heinrichs, bullying
involves a power imbalance, and for children with AS, the power
imbalance is often extreme, due to deficits in social interaction
skills. Dubbed “little professors” by the Austrian
pediatrician who first described the condition because of their
above-average intelligence and ability to talk about special
interests in intense detail, children with AS misinterpret social
interactions, have difficulties interpreting social cues, and
may disrupt class with behaviors considered rude or strange
by others. Other general characteristics of AS, including emotional
vulnerability, anxiousness, inability to easily adapt to change,
and clumsiness add to the likelihood that children with AS will
become targets for bullying.
Kathleen M. Howe, MSW, LCSW, a psychotherapist
in private practice, has some experience working with children,
adolescents, and adults with AS. At her practice, Transitions
Counseling & Coaching in Saylorsburg, PA, she helps couples
in which one partner has AS. “With AS, difficulties with
social behavior are one of the most important defining criteria,”
says Howe. “People with AS lack the natural ability to
see the subtexts of social interaction. They have an impaired
ability to read others’ feelings, gauge level of interest
in a conversation, and understand intended meanings. They may
lack the ability to communicate their own emotional state, resulting
in well-meaning remarks that may offend. They find it hard to
know what is ‘acceptable.’ Thus, in middle school
especially, where the pressure to conform is greatest and tolerance
for differences the least, the AS child may be left out, misunderstood,
teased, or bullied.”
This intensity and frequency of bullying, Heinrichs
writes, puts children with AS at “considerable risk for
serious, long-lasting consequences.” Some consequences
include depression, poor self-esteem, suicidal ideation, anger
management issues, and chronic stress.
The Brain Science
of Bullying
“We are learning a great deal about the brain, stress,
and the limbic system—the emotional center of the brain—and
about emotional intelligence,” says Gary R. Plaford, MSW,
director of social services at Monroe County Community Schools
Corporation. In his book Bullying and the Brain: Using Cognitive
and Emotional Intelligence to Help Kids Cope, Plaford describes
how the brain’s anatomy and function relate to emotions
and behaviors associated with bullying. The locus of control
when emotions are involved—such as being upset when bullied—is
the limbic system, where the “fight or flight” response
is triggered, Plaford says.
Constant exposure to bullying can cause chronic
stress that may result in long-term consequences into adulthood.
Recent psychiatric research, summarized in Plaford’s book,
suggests that high levels of stress in childhood are linked
to a shrunken hippocampus, the part of the limbic system important
in managing stress, and this affects the individual’s
ability to manage stress for the rest of his or her life. Hence,
childhood stress may well be a predictor and precursor of stress-related
disorders in adulthood, says Plaford. “Being bullied regularly
certainly falls in the category of high childhood stress,”
he notes.
Plaford also proposes using the brain’s
emotional functions to facilitate bullying prevention. Recognizing
emotions and feeling empathy for others is a critical part of
emotional intelligence, says Plaford. “The bully tends
to lack empathy for others. No individual can recognize emotions
in another or feel empathy for another if they cannot first
recognize their own emotions and have some control over them,”
he explains. In his book, Plaford discusses external and internal
interventions for addressing bullying. “External interventions
are the monitoring and controlling aspects. Internal interventions
involve teaching, modeling behaviors, and building emotional
intelligence in students so they have the skills and resources
to make better decisions,” he says.
In his book, Plaford discusses key methods for
developing emotional intelligence, including building connections,
creating emotional language or emotional literacy, addressing
emotional triggers, and utilizing routine, which can, in turn,
contribute to bullying prevention. Helping students build connections
with significant adults can increase the likelihood that, when
targeted for bullying, children will seek assistance. Developing
emotional literacy—the expression and understanding of
one’s own emotions and empathy for others—may help
bullies better comprehend the emotional consequences of their
bullying. Helping children understand their emotional triggers
can influence their thought patterns and behaviors toward bullying.
Employing routines can help diminish stress and calm upset students.
Utilizing routines, Plaford says, may be especially
helpful for children with AS who are bullied. “It is interesting
to note that children with autistic spectrum disorders tend
to cry, have a tantrum, or run when their routines are disrupted.
This behavior originates from the ‘fight or flight’
response in the brain’s limbic system,” says Plaford.
By engaging routines to help them regain control and calm, the
locus of control is brought back to the brain’s left hemisphere,
Plaford writes in his book.
Responsibility
for Bullying Prevention: Unreasonable Expectations
Because children with AS are so frequently targeted for bullying
and they lack the inherent ability to interpret social situations,
they may benefit from interventions and educational programs
that increase emotional, behavioral, and social skills awareness.
“Individuals with AS must learn the unwritten rules of
social behavior intellectually rather than intuitively,”
says Howe. Working on emotional triggers to bullying, as Plaford
suggests, may help children with AS learn to calm and control
their own emotional response to bullying. However, it is unreasonable
to expect children with AS to handle bullying completely on
their own, Heinrichs notes.
“Proactive adults are the key to successful
bullying prevention,” says Heinrichs. Teaching children
with AS social and problem-solving skills, emotional literacy,
and self-awareness may help them learn how to build meaningful
relationships and succeed in school. “However, the child
with AS who is actively being bullied and excluded—the
most vulnerable individual—cannot be expected to ‘beat'
the bullies. AS students require support and protection from
adults and peers. And, their ability to learn and stay safe
in school will depend upon exactly how much we are willing and
able to provide them with the support they so desperately need,”
Heinrichs says. Unfortunately, some children with AS may not
even be aware when they are being bullied; therefore, involved
adults need to actively monitor social situations where bullying
can occur.
However, myths about bullying prevent many adults
from understanding and addressing bullying and bullying prevention,
Heinrichs says. “Research indicates that adults almost
always underestimate the extent and impact of bullying compared
to what students report they are experiencing,” she notes.
Teachers, parents, and other involved adults generally view
bullying as a “fact of life” or “kids will
be kids” issue, and that children can handle bullying
on their own. Bullying has been shown to interfere with learning
for students without AS, learning disabilities, and other conditions.
According to research on school violence, the typical high school
student copes with bullying by learning to predict the behavior
of bullies, and that mental energy used to stay safe detracted
from academic learning. “If ‘typical’ students
are using too much energy trying to predict bullying behaviors
and stay safe in school, how much energy might students with
AS be using? Predicting behavior is a clear area of difficulty
for individuals with AS. How can these extremely vulnerable
individuals survive school when the main coping mechanism they
need is severely compromised, and their behaviors and social
deficits put them at risk for bullying and exclusion?”
questions Heinrichs.
“It is critically important for adults
to understand that individuals with AS are at extremely high
risk for bullying, based on available research and the challenges
of living with AS. Children with AS will experience difficulties
in the social arena and will exhibit behaviors that set them
up for being perceived as different by their peers,” Heinrichs
emphasizes.
Therefore, she says, adults who work with and
advocate for these students must acknowledge this fact and be
provided with information about AS and how it affects education
and peer relationships. “If adults ignore bullying or
do nothing, they imply acceptance of the bullying behaviors
and set standards for behavioral expectations that can increase
feelings of self-blame and hopelessness for the unfortunate
individuals being targeted,” Heinrichs says.
She also emphasizes the importance for adults
to model behaviors they expect from children. Numerous incidents
of parents and adults in authority positions (teachers, scout
leaders, coaches) facilitating bullying or even bullying themselves
are documented on the forum of her Web site for individuals
with AS and parents of children with AS (www.aspergerinformation.org).
In her book, Heinrichs cites several examples
of “educational bullying,” when teachers and other
involved adults use authority to either intentionally or unintentionally
harm students, causing them distress. For instance, sarcasm
may be used as humor or to control the classroom by many teachers
and can inadvertently create a hostile classroom environment
because students will model teacher behavior. Heinrichs says,
“Children with AS are more likely to experience educational
bullying because of the innate characteristics of AS.”
The subtleties of sarcasm are not apparent for children with
AS and can elicit behavioral responses that will encourage other
students to make fun of them, she explains.
In addition to adults intervening to prevent
bullying, other children can also assist in bullying prevention.
“Peer education is also critical because we perform an
injustice to other students if we ask them to feel empathy and
understanding for a peer with AS when they have absolutely no
understanding of their unique challenges and strengths,”
Heinrichs emphasizes.
“Students, especially bystanders, can
play a major role in establishing an atmosphere where bullying
is not tolerated,” Plaford says.
Unfortunately, as Heinrichs notes in her book,
bystanders either reinforce bullying by providing an audience
or supporting the bully, rather than defending the target. Fear
of retaliation and peer pressure may discourage bystanders from
becoming directly involved in bullying prevention or to report
bullying to adults. According to Heinrichs, bystanders make
up the majority of students at any one time, and therefore have
the potential to assist in bullying prevention.
Plaford further explains, “If we can build
emotional intelligence in bystanders—in other words, the
school population—so that bystanders begin to truly feel
empathy for others, then we can impact the school culture and
turn it into one that does not tolerate bullying.” Heinrichs
also advocates a “whole-school approach” to bullying
prevention that can positively engage bystanders to react to
bullying incidents (see sidebar).
Bullying Prevention: The Social
Worker’s Role
Schools—where bullying most frequently occurs—are
not always staffed with a social worker. Special education programs
may involve social workers in family interactions, such as helping
the family find community resources to address barriers (eg,
finances, transportation) to special needs services. Very few
social services professionals, though—even those dedicated
to special education—have participated in training on
autistic spectrum disorders beyond a one-day seminar or weekend
workshop.
However, that does not mean the social worker
cannot impact the quality of school life for children with AS—many
social workers play key roles in bullying prevention in schools,
says Heinrichs. Social workers can create educational programs
for parents, teachers, and students and provide individual counseling
for students to increase understanding of the dynamics involved
in bullying. “Social workers can also play an important
role in helping build emotional intelligence in both children
and adults. They have the skills to accomplish this in a manner
that causes bullying to become ‘real’ and emphasizes
the actual impact of bullying on all involved,” Heinrichs
says. “The social worker can also contribute to making
sure that students, parents, and professionals clearly understand
that there is ‘no middle ground’ where bullying
is concerned and that bullying prevention is [and will continue
to be] a priority. The social worker can take an active role
in making sure everyone has a clear understanding of behavioral
expectations.”
Another role for the social worker is participating
in the formation and enforcement of an Individualized Educational
Plan (IEP) for children with AS—one that includes bullying
issues. “Bullying is almost never addressed in the IEP,
even though it may be the most crucial factor influencing the
child’s ability to learn. Many well-intentioned educators
are currently struggling with how to address this issue,”
Heinrichs observes. Because social workers may be asked to participate
in IEP meetings, they can assist in coordinating services among
involved professionals.
“A ‘whole-picture’ approach
to community services is often a strength the social worker
brings to the table. The social worker’s training and
expertise can help other IEP team members understand the characteristics
and challenges of children with AS, and how these may affect
their educational experience,” says Heinrichs.
“Interventions will have to be customized
to the individual child,” Howe emphasizes. “The
social worker will be most effective when working together with
teachers and other school staff to design interventions for
social periods such as gym, lunch, and recess,” she explains.
According to Heinrichs, as the prevalence of
AS is increasing and more students require an IEP and specialized
services, social workers can help other professionals navigate
the many social, communication, and behavioral issues that will
need to be addressed in a variety of settings, including the
educational environment.
— Jennifer Sisk, MA, is a suburban
Philadelphia-based freelance writer with 15 years of experience
as a writer and research analyst in the healthcare field. She
has written on depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,
schizophrenia, mental wellness, and aging.
Whole-School Approach to Bullying
Prevention
According to Rebekah Heinrichs, MSN, MSEd, an educational consultant
specializing in autism and AS, and the author of the book Perfect
Targets: Asperger Syndrome and Bullying — Practical Solutions
for Surviving the Social World, the whole-school approach is
supported by research and is based on a model developed by Dan
Olweus, PhD, a Norwegian researcher and author of Bullying at
School: What We Know and What We Can Do.
Critical components of a whole-school approach
to bullying prevention are detailed in Heinrichs’ book
and include the following:
1. Adult awareness and involvement—training
to become proactive.
2. An anonymous questionnaire survey to students
(optimally to parents and teachers as well) to determine bullying
issues in the school.
3. Effective proactive supervision in identified
high-risk areas by trained, engaged adults.
4. An ongoing commitment to bullying prevention,
not just a “one-time campaign,” through the formation
of a group of committed, interested professionals, parents,
and students that will continue to gather and disseminate information
on bullying prevention and serve as a resource for others.
5. Communication of clear expectations and rules
to everyone (students, parents, and professionals) regarding
what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior through class and
school rules directly related to bullying.
6. Schoolwide training on how to respond to
bullying as an adult, student, target, or witness.
7. Ongoing class meetings about bullying that
prioritize bullying prevention.
8. Commitment to never ignore bullying and to
have serious talks with all those involved (bullies, targets,
and bystanders) when bullying occurs.
9. Inclusion of special considerations for children
with disabilities and modifications to accommodate their needs
with regard to bullying prevention.
10. Intolerance for even low-level bullying by adult role models.
Resources
Asperger Information—Targeting Information to Parents
and Professionals. Available at: http://www.aspergerinformation.org
Heinrichs, R. (2003). Perfect Targets: Asperger
Syndrome and Bullying—Practical Solutions for Surviving
the Social World. Autism Asperger Publishing Company.
O’Brien, M., & Daggett, J. A. (2006).
Beyond the Autism Diagnosis: A Professional’s Guide to
Helping Families. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Online Asperger Syndrome Information and Support.
Available at: http://www.aspergersyndrome.org
|