Better Wages
for Social Workers — Why Not?
By Lynn K. Jones, DSW
Social Work Today
Vol. 5 No. 4 P. 32
Are social workers’ professional passion and lack of preparation
in articulating their skills keeping wages low?
“Social Worker Shortage Puts Children at Risk.” Headlines
like this have been ringing alarm bells in communities across the
country. The implications are far-reaching and cross all sectors of
society. “The shortage of social workers affects the continuity
of care, especially for vulnerable populations, and increases the
workload for already overburdened staff,” states a study completed
at Berkeley (Pastor, E. M., Saint-Germain, M., & DeCresceza, T.,
2002). The demand for social workers is likely to be even greater
over the next few years as boomers retire.
That should be good news for social workers. Usually, an industry
labor shortage spurs wage increases. “Wages usually go through
the roof in a shortage,” says Michael Barth, PhD, an economist
consulting with the Hartford Foundation on planning gerontology services.
Social workers know better. Why aren’t social work wages obeying
the law of supply and demand?
Labor Supply Too Elastic
Seeking to understand that paradox, Barth was commissioned to take
a “first look” at the labor market of social work. Completed
in 2001, the study, The Labor Market for Social Workers: A First Look,
identifies “the highly elastic supply” of labor as a key
factor. “A characteristic of the social work labor market is
that there are a lot of people who can go into the market and purport
to supply themselves as social workers. What a highly elastic supply
means is that if you raise the wage a little bit, you get a lot more
people in the field. Social work is like that because anyone with
a bachelor’s degree can get a job that many social workers think
of as a social work job.” Similarly, other master’s-level
professionals can capture the market traditionally filled by social
workers. Thus, as the shortage of social workers has created a labor
crisis, alternative professionals have flooded the field.
Carol Nesslein Doelling, MS, has been advising social workers in
their careers for the last 20 years in her role as the Career Services
Center director at the George Warren Brown School of Social Work at
Washington University in St. Louis and is the author of Social Work
Career Development: A Handbook for Job Hunting and Career Planning,
2nd Edition (National Association of Social Work Press, 2005). She
believes social workers are not well-prepared to articulate their
differentiating skills. “When a field is well-established in
the market, has an identity, and has a clear niche, then the education
side does not need to address those issues, but when the field is
more diffused and there is plenty of competition from other disciplines
that also have some skills and knowledge to contribute, then on the
education side you really have to work at preparing your students
to articulate their education, to talk about their differentiating
factors, including the type of degree that they have, their specific
education, their degree program, and their own particular experience.
I don’t think that most people can readily do that. It takes
a lot of preparation. This is true for new graduates and also for
people who have been in their particular position for a while, as
they have become comfortable with their job and have not needed to
articulate their value.” She emphasizes, “Preparing individuals
in social work at all levels to take on that challenge and articulate
their value is an imperative.”
Lack of Parity With Other Professions
MSWs earn on average 18.5% more than BA-level social workers. But,
Barth says, the 18.5% is “not all that notable” compared
with other fields. Social workers earn 11% less than other occupations
after adjusting for other factors. Social work is a relatively low-paid
field at all levels of training and education. Barth notes that “social
workers are not a highly paid profession compared with other professions
with similar levels of education.”
Joni* tells this story that illustrates Barth’s point: “A
dear friend of mine works as a legal assistant for an attorney at
the biggest law firm in town. She has realized that it really is not
right that she earns $15,000 a year more than me. She has her high
school diploma and has worked in the legal field for 10 years. I have
my master’s degree, am working on my doctorate, used to be a
certified addictions counselor in the state of Pennsylvania, and have
almost 20 years of experience. She is shocked that I work with other
human beings, trying to help them, and I can barely make ends meet
each month.”
Social work wages suffer because more than 75% of social workers
are women. Margaret Gibelman, DSW, has researched this issue and found
that the more a service profession is dominated by women, the lower
the worker’s average weekly salary. “The data revealed
that as the percentage of women in the identified occupational groups
increases, the weekly salary decreases” (Gibelman, 2003). For
female social workers, it is a double whammy—they earn lower
wages because they are female and they earn lower wages because they
work in a female-dominated field. Men also suffer from working in
a female-dominated field and earn lower wages than their counterparts
in other professions.
Mission Trumps Money
Economists understand that there are numerous factors that affect
the supply of people for an occupation. One is the relative wage and
another is their “taste” for that kind of work. Barth
says, “When people are choosing an occupation, they tend to
choose something they think they will enjoy doing. We call that taste.”
While completing his study, Barth talked to a lot of social workers
and found that social workers are motivated by their mission and that
they have a taste for their work. He says, “It became obvious
very quickly that the taste for what social workers are doing was
very high. It was palpable. I concluded that these people really like
what they are doing.” Barth believes one reason the pay for
social workers is relatively low is that social workers like what
they are doing so much that they will do it for less money. Is everyone
who likes what they do willing to do it for less money? Barth says,
“No.” Does the fact that social workers seem to be overwhelmingly
willing to do so cause them to be exploited? “Perhaps,”
Barth says.
Jessica,* a seasoned human services worker pursuing a graduate degree,
explains: “I never forget the people who are the reason I receive
my paycheck. Too many times you see people trudge off to work and
then back home. When we are at work, we do good things for people.
We assist them in making some life altering changes. While it is true
that many social work positions are low-paying and that can be frustrating,
I never heard anyone say that they went into this field for the money.
One does not enter social work with ideas about making millions, but
about making a difference. Making a difference to others brings a
reward that is so much more valuable.”
Political Landscape
Trends emerging from the political landscape greatly influence the
social work labor market. Perhaps the most salient is the economic
situation. As the federal and state governments continue to make cuts
because of budget deficits, the funding for social workers in both
the public and private sectors is likely to continue to suffer, suggests
Barth. This climate has increased the competition for funding and
fee-for-service revenue, making the world of the social worker less
secure than ever.
Social workers willing to make out-of-the-box transitions may find
opportunities in the new landscape for specific skill sets. For example,
reductions in funding have increased expectations for managing healthcare
and mental healthcare costs, which has created opportunities for social
workers interested in evaluating programs and demonstrating the results
that the new climate of accountability requires. Social workers with
an entrepreneurial spirit may find that funding constraints have created
a field ripe with possibility as programs are privatized and organizations
are reorganized, with many looking to partner and collaborate with
others.
Doelling observes that there have been many new nonprofit organizations
created in recent years. “Many of them are small and people
need to consider what it is like to be in a smaller environment, which
may be better for some people than others.” New ways of delivering
services, such as the wraparound strengths-based approach, have found
traction in the new environment. These services appeal to some social
workers, but not to all.
Career Strategy
“I didn’t choose a career in social work—I was led
to it,” explains Jessica. “It’s a difficult job
at best that can at times tear your heart out. It is also the most
rewarding job. I have been hit, kicked, spit at, kidnapped, and threatened
with death, but I would not dream of giving it up. The parents who
ask for help or the child that says ‘thank you’ is what
keeps me going. Many people have said, ‘I don’t know how
you do it.’ The fact is, I don’t know how not do it. It
is something within us, something we are born with—social work
chooses us.”
According to Mitchell, Levin, and Krumboltz (1999), chance typically
plays an important role in everyone’s career. Being “chosen”
by social work as Jessica was or leaving your social work career up
to chance is exactly what you shouldn’t do, according to Doelling,
who encourages people to research the work setting they are considering.
“Most people don’t have the time or don’t take the
time to do that and it really makes a difference for them.”
She says, “I tell them—over and over again—that
in this social work labor market, it is going to depend on how you
manage your own career because the structured career path does not
exist like it once did—you are running your own show. The assumption
is that ‘if I take this job that it is all going to fall into
place’ and that is just not the case with the kind of economy
that we have. If we can get people to focus so that they can spend
time doing the research and building their network, they can make
more informed choices and ultimately have more choices.”
Doelling also advises social workers considering a new job to “follow
the money.” She explains: “That doesn’t mean taking
a position that is related to the hottest idea of the moment. But
by understanding the funding streams, how they have shifted and are
shifting, social workers can anticipate changes that are going to
come up and opportunities that they can take advantage of.”
Doelling urges social workers when considering a specific position
to negotiate offers. “I am really encouraging people to think
about that, attempt it, and to do that faithfully and that can really
have a positive impact.”
Doelling says graduates now spend an average of three months looking
for a position, which she says, is not long enough. She cites the
example of a student who did what she recommends: “This graduate
had some prior experience. After she got her masters, she went back
home to California, and took a temporary job at her old hospital.
She looked for six months and really worked hard at it—doing
the networking and the research—until she found the supervisory
job that she wanted. She turned down other offers, but that was part
of her plan. She was the right person for the job and she was able
to negotiate a good salary for herself.”
Future Possibility for Better Wages
A meaningful social work career does not necessarily mean poor wages.
But it does seem that social workers will earn a better living only
by focusing on that goal. They need to work at understanding and articulating
their differentiating skills and abilities. They need to research
the field and each position so they can make creative and strategic
work choices. They need to be willing to negotiate reasonable compensation
rates. Social workers are great advocates for their clients. Now is
the time to advocate for themselves.
* Names were changed for confidentiality reasons.
— Lynn K. Jones, DSW, is a freelance writer and an executive
coach and organizational consultant in Santa Barbara, CA. As a specialist
in organizational culture, she supports leaders and organizations
in developing mission-driven cultures.
References
Gibelman, M. (2003, January) So how far have we come? Pestilent and
persistent gender gap in pay. Social Work, 48, 22-32.
Mitchell, K. E., Levin, A. S., & Krumboltz, J. D. (1999). Planned
happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal
of Counseling & Development, 77, 2, 115.
Pasztor, E. M., Saint-Germain, M., & DeCrescenzo, T. Demand for
Social Workers in California, April 2002. Available at: http://www.csus.edu/calst/government_affairs/reports/Demand_for_Social_Workers.pdf
|
 |