July/August 2013 Issue
Group Concept Mapping Software — Organizer, Equalizer
Concepts drive every creative and practical task, plan, and project, but managing those concepts—inviting, capturing, sharing, and analyzing them—can be a daunting prospect. It’s fraught with challenges such as how to organize disparate ideas, link similar thoughts, and give equal consideration to the contributions of numerous participants.
One powerful solution to these problems is concept mapping, which Tamara S. Davis, PhD, MSSW, an associate professor in Ohio State University’s College of Social Work, describes as “a complete approach to engaging people in research and planning processes intended to lead to action.”
There are numerous types of concept mapping, but most, says Michael Huffman, associate manager of operations at Concept Systems, involve individuals working alone and in a free-form manner to manually organize the relationships among their own ideas, a process known as mind mapping.
“Concept Systems’ version of concept-mapping software [CS Global MAX], however, is the only one that combines group brainstorming, sorting, and rating using a rigorous statistical methodology to create a conceptual framework,” Huffman claims. Davis, an experienced user, describes it as “a participatory planning, evaluation, and research method that uses a structured process to conceptualize and organize ideas around a specific construct or topic of interest. A qualitative design is used in combination with qualitative and quantitative data and analyses.”
According to Johnny S. Kim, PhD, LICSW, an associate professor in the University of Denver’s Graduate School of Social Work, who has used Concept Systems’ software for numerous projects, “It provides a unique way to identify, conceptualize, and visually represent thoughts and ideas regarding program characteristics and outcomes.” The multivariate statistical techniques it employs, Kim adds, are particularly useful when examining complex problems for social issues such as dropping out of high school.
“Concept mapping is much more than the software,” Davis says, suggesting that the crux of the process is the concepts. But Concept Systems’ program, which she describes as a “tool to help structure, visualize, and understand the information gathered,” is integral to the process.
Brainstorming to Organize
After sorting and mapping, Huffman says, “We ask participants individually to rate each idea based on value dimensions such as importance or feasibility, so that the priority of each of the ideas or clusters of ideas can be determined.” Davis adds, “For example, participants might rate the importance of each idea or to what extent the ideas are implemented. Comparisons can then be made between groups of participants based on their average ratings of the ideas. The results from concept mapping can help determine priorities, develop a roadmap for change, and assess gains in outcomes over time.”
One of the software’s key features is the ability to democratize the process of conceptualizing a plan or project and organize input from multiple sources without referencing a hierarchy of contributors. “With a typical internal planning or problem-solving process at a corporation, the executives or board members usually steer the course for the company,” says Huffman, who observes that group input tends to be more valued within social service or academic organizations.
“The method offers transparency and gives primacy to participant voice,” Davis agrees. “It provides a methodological and objective approach to structuring a broad range of individual ideas while honoring both group and individual input.”
Concept mapping and concept-mapping software have capabilities that go to the heart of the social work profession and aptly serve its missions. For example, Huffman explains, “Structured group concept mapping builds consensus, allowing stakeholders to contribute to the process without attribution and captures how each individual participant views the world. Once the data is analyzed, a shared structure depicting group consensus can be achieved based on the integrated data.”
Concept mapping lets multiple groups of participants—those in disparate groups, participants across staffing levels, and individuals in different geographic locations—to take part in the brainstorming and analysis process from start to finish, Davis says.
“Because concept mapping provides a practical approach to program evaluation that uses information from multiple stakeholders in assessment and evaluation of community programs, it’s ideal for use in social service and educational programs that combine information gathering with problem-solving activities to produce practical solutions,” says Kim, who notes that the problem-solving approach makes it especially useful in social work practice.
Practical Applications in Social Work
Furthermore, Huffman says many social workers have relied on concept mapping in academic settings as well as in community-based participatory research.
Kim says among the tasks for which concept mapping is being used in social work are assessing cultural competence and perceptions of spirituality, developing measurement systems, examining program fidelity, assessing disadvantaged groups’ mental health needs, and examining community responses to trauma. Huffman says recent concept mapping with Concept Systems’ software includes a project with students, staff, and faculty at a major university to determine what needs are not being met for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning students and, at a medical school, an effort to determine the issues that affect students’ well-being and create a plan for programs to address those issues.
Davis has used concept mapping for research and planning with numerous organizations and systems, several addressing diversity-related interests. “I’ve used concept mapping with multiple systems of care as an exploratory research approach to further social work’s understanding of the complex construct of cultural competence and to provide service systems with information to improve their cultural competence with children and families,” she says.
Ohio State University’s College of Social Work used concept mapping to engage faculty, staff, and community members in redesigning the curriculum, according to Davis. “As a result, the college responded to the many voices of input and developed a new curriculum to meet the needs of our students, the college, and the community in the context of professional shifts and practice competencies.”
Kim has found concept-mapping software to be a key tool in his research. He employed it recently in a study exploring student perspectives on behavioral and school-related changes following participation in a child savings account program. Using concept mapping helped answer the study questions because it permitted him to incorporate the students’ perspective. “It allowed for a richer understanding of how assets obtained through child savings accounts affected the high school students’ academic and behavior goals,” he explains.
Kim suggests that social workers interested in learning more about concept mapping explore William Trochim’s introduction to the subject: “An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation.” Additionally, Davis advises neophytes to explore the growing literature base in social work on the use of concept mapping for research, evaluation, and planning to see how social work researchers and practitioners have incorporated the approach in their work.
— Kate Jackson is an editor and freelance writer based in Milford, PA, and a frequent contributor to Social Work Today.