Nov/Dec 2007
Drugs
for Drugs — Medications to Treat Addictions
By John K. Smith, PhD, LCSW
Social Work Today
Vol. 7 No. 6 P. 40
Using medications to help treat substance
abusers has its critics, but in many cases, they’ve been
effective. Know what’s available because these drugs are
here to stay.
Roughly 8 million people in the United States
currently meet the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence
(Grant, Dawson, Stinson, & Chou, 2004). Another 6 million
or more meet the criteria for alcohol abuse.
Alcohol dependence is considered a major public
health problem and is ranked as the fourth leading cause of
disability (Murray & Lopez, 1996). Additionally, illicit
and prescription drug abuse and dependence is on the rise. The
creation of newer and more potent opiate-based prescription
medications for pain treatment, such as oxycodone (OxyContin)
and hydrocodone (Vicodin), along with easier access to these
medications via physicians and the Internet, has led to widespread
abuse and addiction, according to the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA) (2001).
The estimated annual cost of substance use disorders
in the United States is $510 billion (Doweiko, 2002). Millions
of people have suffered or are suffering from the ravages of
drug abuse and addiction. Millions more have suffered by being
in a relationship with someone abusing or addicted to substances.
Addiction treatment has evolved extensively
during the last several years. The primary psychosocial treatment
method involves a 12-step-based program structured around the
principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Clients are taught
the basic “steps” and principles of recovery and
learn to live clean and sober. Participation in 12-step-based
support groups is usually mandatory or highly encouraged.
However, newer methods have emerged in the treatment
of substance abuse and addiction. The use of cognitive behavioral
therapy, including skills training; motivational enhancement
techniques, a stages of change model; and integrated treatment
for clients with co-occurring disorders have been shown to increase
positive outcomes in addiction treatment (Smith, 2007). While
there is no “magic bullet” or cure for addiction,
substance abuse treatment has been shown effective in reducing
drug use and its associated health and social costs. Treatment
is less expensive than alternatives such as no treatment or
incarceration (NIDA, 2001).
Specialized medications to treat substance abuse
and addiction have also been added to the arsenal of weapons
for fighting this “disease.” While not a new concept,
the use of medications to treat substance abuse and addiction
has potential but is controversial. Ironically, the biggest
controversy comes from the people these medications are designed
to treat. “Many of us in the 12-step community do not
believe that a person is really clean and sober if they have
to use drugs to get off of drugs,” says Danny F., a long-standing
member of a 12-step program. While AA and Narcotics Anonymous
organizations formally support the use of prescription medications
necessary to treat mental illness or other medical issues, many
believe that the use of any medications, especially mood-altering
medications, puts a member’s sobriety in question (Smith,
2007).
Additionally, many newer medications are designed
to be dispensed in primary care settings, such as doctors’
offices and clinics. While potentially offering access to more
people and decreasing the stigma of addiction treatment, there
has been reluctance on the part of many primary care physicians
to prescribe these medications. This is in spite of an increasing
body of research that shows the effectiveness of such medications
(Kranzler & Van Kirk, 2001). Some healthcare providers,
like some clients, question the value of using any drug to treat
drug or alcohol addiction (Freed & York, 1997).
To better understand how medications are used
in the treatment of substance abuse and addiction, this article
will review the most prominent medications on the market.
Medications for Treating Alcohol Dependence
and Abuse
Disulfiram
(Antabuse)
One of the oldest medications used in the treatment of alcohol
abuse/addiction is disulfiram. It was designed to provide users
with aversive and unpleasant effects when they drink alcohol.
The medication works by preventing the breakdown of alcohol
in the body, creating numerous unpleasant reactions ranging
from flushing and nausea to, in some cases, death. The goal
is alcohol avoidance based on the fear of experiencing these
unpleasant effects. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that
the use of disulfiram results in higher abstinence rates or
longer periods of abstinence (Doweiko, 2002).
Because of the potentially dangerous results
and complications, this medication is not used with everyone
attempting to stop drinking alcohol. Users must be educated
about how to use the medication safely and must also be motivated
to use it regularly. This medication can act as an additional
support tool for those who are able to use it. Fear of the unpleasant
side effects can help to give users time to “think before
they drink.” For many, this extra time may help the user
to avoid impulsive drinking. Unfortunately, research shows that
many users stop the medication a few days before they plan to
drink, suggesting that there is less of an impulsive reaction
and more of a planned one. This relapse process is triggered
by or will trigger intense cravings for alcohol.
Naltrexone
(ReVia)
In 1994, naltrexone was approved by the FDA to treat alcohol
dependence after the medication was shown to reduce the frequency
of drinking and likelihood of relapse to heavy drinking (Garbutt
et al., 2005). The drug is considered an opioid antagonist and
acts by blocking the effects of opiate drugs. It is also thought
to reduce the behavioral response to alcohol. Several components
of the alcohol drinking sequence are affected, including lowered
cravings, decreased reinforcement of drinking, and increased
headache and nausea that further reduces the quantity of intake
(Keltner & Folks, 2005).
Numerous studies have shown the effectiveness
of this medication in reducing drinking and preventing relapse
(Kranzler & Van Kirk, 2001). According to Said Jacob, MD,
a psychiatrist and addictionologist practicing in Glendora,
CA, “I have been using naltrexone and related medications
successfully for a long time. They really work to reduce the
cravings for alcohol. I generally keep patients on it for six
months to one year. I want patients to not rely totally on the
medicine to not drink. They must be in some form of supportive
therapy or recovery.” Jacob also says that this medication
successfully reduces opiate cravings and use.
One problem with the use of naltrexone, as well
as other medications, is compliance (Doweiko, 2002). Low motivation,
avoidance of unpleasant side effects, cognitive impairments,
and willful neglect are cited as primary reasons for noncompliance.
To combat the problem of medication noncompliance, a new long-acting
injectable form of naltrexone called Vivitrol has been developed.
Clients receive a once-per-month injection of the medication
rather than taking daily oral doses. Jacob reports that he is
seeing good results with this form of the medication, and clinical
trials have supported his observations. He cautions that it
is still too early to determine the long-term effectiveness
of this medication.
Acamprosate
(Campral)
Another medication used for treating alcohol dependence is acamprosate.
Like naltrexone, it is used to reduce alcohol cravings and prevent
relapse. It is chemically different than naltrexone and has
agonist effects at gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors and inhibitory
effects at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (Keltner & Folks,
2005). It can be used separately or in combination with naltrexone.
In a meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled
trials of naltrexone or acamprosate for alcoholism treatment,
there were significant effects on treatment retention and/or
drinking outcomes. There did not seem to be any statistically
significant difference between the two drugs in these areas
(Kranzler & Van Kirk, 2001). However, the authors state
that there has been an absence of studies comparing the effects
of these medications. One recent randomized controlled trial,
the COMBINE Study, examined the efficacy of acamprosate, naltrexone,
and combined behavioral interventions (CBI) (Anton et al., 2006).
The researchers looked at each medication individually with
or without CBI and combined with or without CBI. They reported
that medical management with naltrexone, CBI, or both produced
better outcomes, but acamprosate showed no evidence of efficacy
with or without CBI. Also, there was no evidence that combining
the two medications produced better results than the naltrexone
or CBI alone. Thus, more research is needed concerning the overall
effectiveness of acamprosate for treating alcohol dependence.
Medications for Treating
Opiate Dependence and Abuse
Opiate addiction often comes in two forms: addiction to illicit
drugs such as heroin and addiction to prescription drugs—sometimes
obtained illicitly—containing an opiate, primarily used
to treat acute or chronic pain. Vicodin and OxyContin are the
most well-known of these drugs. Many people become addicted
to these prescription medications due to long-term use and dosage
increases due to tolerance without ever abusing them.
At some point, many opiate users become physically
dependent and continue to use or abuse the drug to avoid withdrawal
symptoms. While not life-threatening, withdrawal from opiates
is unpleasant. Usually, the symptoms are flu-like and can be
moderate to severe. Some people attempt to stop using opiates
cold turkey without medication or support. While some are successful,
many relapse because of intense drug cravings or intolerance
of the withdrawal symptoms. Paul Koo, PharmD, a pharmacist at
Doctor’s Hospital of West Covina, CA, describes the withdrawal
from heroin and other opiates “... like falling off a
cliff.”
Medications can be used to ameliorate withdrawal
and replace or substitute for illicit drugs. While some have
been used for many years, new medications have been developed
that offer promising results.
Methadone
Used extensively for the treatment of opiate withdrawal and
replacement since the mid-1960s, methadone has helped thousands
of opiate addicts stop using opiates altogether or replace their
illicit drug use and corresponding lifestyle and behavior with
a return to more normal functioning.
While methadone can be used to ameliorate withdrawal
symptoms in early detoxification, it is most known for its use
in long-term maintenance. It is estimated that approximately
179,000 individuals are in a methadone maintenance program in
the United States (Doweiko, 2002).
The usual treatment course involves daily visits
to a licensed clinic to receive a single dose of methadone to
offset cravings and withdrawal symptoms. Theoretically, clients
also will receive psychosocial support services, including drug
testing, to verify abstinence from other drugs. While this is
the desired approach, it has not been the practice in many programs
that offer little more than a steady supply of oral methadone
(Doweiko, 2002).
One positive effect of methadone maintenance
vs. the continued use of heroin or other opiates is that by
receiving a regular dose of medication, the client is not forced
to engage in illegal or undesirable behaviors to secure the
drug. Unfortunately, if clients are not monitored or receiving
psychosocial support, they may continue to engage in drug abuse
and the associated lifestyle.
Levo-alpha Acetyl Methadol
(LAAM)
An alternative to methadone is a medication known as LAAM that
is also primarily used as a replacement therapy for opiate drugs.
LAAM is sometimes preferred to methadone because it requires
less frequent dosing, allowing for fewer clinic visits and expanded
integration into work and other rehabilitative activities (Keltner
& Folks, 2005). LAAM treatment outcomes are comparable to
methadone with respect to reduction of opioid use, although
retention rates are higher for clients treated with methadone
(Keltner & Folks, 2005). Longer LAAM treatments are associated
with better outcomes.
Buprenorphine
Relatively new medications—two forms of buprenorphine—were
approved in 2002 for office-based treatment of opioid abuse
and addiction. Suboxone and Subutex are used for detoxification
and maintenance treatment. These medications come as sublingual
tablets and can be self-administered.
Outcomes appear to be similar to methadone,
and some studies have produced promising results on the effectiveness
(Amass, Bickel, Higgins, & Hughes, 1994). One advantage
is that the client does not need to visit a registered clinic
several times per week, increasing access and convenience. A
disadvantage is that it makes it easier for the client to avoid
or discount the importance of psychosocial rehabilitation or
support. Physicians wishing to prescribe this medication must
meet special training criteria and agree to treat no more than
30 patients at any time in their individual practice.
Subjectively, many clients being treated with
buprenorphine report better results and compliance even with
previous failures on methadone or other treatments. Koo adds,
“Buprenorphine eases the fall and for some, it seems to
stop the fall altogether.”
The Search for a “Cure”
The use of medications in the treatment of substance abuse and
dependence has become a new priority as scientists, physicians,
and treatment providers look for a “magic bullet”
that will stop or prevent the cycle of addiction. Current research
and clinical trials are being conducted on numerous promising
medications and treatments.
One area of resistance to the use of medications
for substance abuse treatment is the ongoing debate regarding
abstinence vs. harm reduction. Many in the substance abuse treatment
field and the 12-step support community believe that total abstinence
from substances (including psychotropic medications) is a necessity
for a person to be truly clean and sober. For many, especially
those with co-occurring disorders, abstinence is a goal but
not an absolute (Smith, 2007). Using medications to reduce cravings,
avoid relapse, or decrease the frequency and effects of drug
or alcohol use (harm reduction) can offer hope and reduce the
emotional and social costs of substance abuse and addiction.
— John K. Smith, PhD, LCSW, is a licensed
psychotherapist with more than 25 years of experience in the
mental health and chemical dependency fields and is the program
administrator for the Dual Diagnosis Day Treatment Program at
Doctor’s Hospital of West Covina, CA. He is also a professor
of alcohol and drug counseling at Mt. San Antonio College in
Walnut, CA, and the author of the recently published book Co-occurring
Substance Abuse and Mental Disorders: A Practitioner’s
Guide.
References
Amass, L., Bickel, W.K., Higgins, S.T., Hughes, J.R. (1994).
A preliminary investigation of outcome following gradual or
rapid buprenorphine detoxification. Journal of Addictive
Disease, 13(3), 33-45.
Anton, R.F., O’Malley, S.S., Ciraulo,
D.A., Cisler, R.A., Couper, D., Donovan, D.M., et al. (2006).
Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for
alcohol dependence: The COMBINE study: A randomized controlled
trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association,
295(17), 2003-2017.
Doweiko, H.E. (2002). Concepts of
chemical dependency, 5th ed., Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks-Cole.
Freed, P.E. & York, L.N. (1997). Naltrexone:
A controversial therapy for alcohol dependence. Journal
of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services,
35(7), 24-28.
Garbutt, J.C., Kranzler, H.R., O’Malley,
S.S., Gastfriend, D.R., Pettinati, H.M., Silverman, B.L., et
al. (2005). Efficacy and tolerability of long-acting injectable
naltrexone for alcohol dependence: A randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of the American Medical Association,
293(13), 1617-1625.
Grant, B.F., Dawson, D.A., Stinson, F.S., Chou,
S.P., Dufour, M.C., Pickering, R.P. (2004). The 12-month prevalence
and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States,
1991-1992 and 2001-2002. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,
74(3), 223-234.
Keltner, N.L., and Folks, D.G. (2005). Psychotropic
drugs, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Kranzler, H.R., Van Kirk, J. (2001). Efficacy
of naltrexone and acamprosate for alcoholism treatment: A meta-analysis.
Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research,
25(9), 1335-1341.
Murray, C.J.L., Lopez, A.D. (Eds.) (1996). Global
burden of disease. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University
Press.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2001). Epidemiological
trends in drug abuse - Advance report, December 2001. Community
Epidemiological Work Group.
Smith, J.K. (2007). Co-occurring
substance abuse and mental disorders: A practitioner’s
guide. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson/Rowman and Littlefield.
|